The Ford Fiesta ST and the VW Polo GTI face off in an interesting duel of small sports cars. The two yield 200 HP of power. Which is the most complete of the two?
The small GTI of the B segment has not only climbed exponentially in terms of maximum power, but they have also increased their dimensions and equipment, to pick up the baton of the compact GTI primitives of the ’80s of the last century , but with much greater possibilities. You just have to review the basic data of the first generations of our protagonists – the Ford Fiesta 1.5 EcoBoost 200Hp ST and the VW Polo 2.0 TSI 200 HP DSG GTI- to realize this. Not in vain, the first sports Fiesta, the XR2, was born in 1980 with a 1.6 that developed 83 hp, with 3.65 m in length, for in 1989 reach with a 1.6i the 116 hp. The pole in its second generation, a few years later, put in play the GT version with the same length and 75 HP to later reach 116 with the supercharged G40. Today, almost four decades later, our protagonists reach 200 Horsepower with bodies that exceed 4 m and a technology inconceivable to their ancestors.
They are no longer dealing with more powerful versions with a brief preparation, as they did in the past. Now, the work goes further, with a technical load far superior to that present in the models from which they derive. Especially in the Fiesta , which launches innovative solutions in engine and frame to be configured as one of the small GTI sports more sporting , while the Polo lives up to its acronym GTI to achieve a tremendous balance between that sportiness , perhaps without transmitting as many sensations as its rival, and use pleasure in day-to-day driving .
Ford Fiesta ST vs VW Polo GTI: Interior
Despite being full of sports and color details, its interiors are barely separated from their range brothers. The most striking are the sports seats signed by Recaro for the ST while the GTI is unmarked with its configurable digital instrumentation and the display of the information and entertainment system , both tactile and 8 “, with the possibility of reflecting racing data; as virtual clocks with G forces, turbo pressure, the ower used
The driving position in both is correct, but not very sporty . As in the utilities from which they derive, with stools that can not be placed in a very low plane. The only thing is how low is the shift lever in the ST, because of its thick steering wheel rings – slightly more in the Fiesta – and pedal-centered sensations are good. The quality of execution in both is similar, with an abundance of hard plastics although the soft ones of the Polo are more pleasant to the touch.
|SPACE||Ford Fiesta 1.5 EcoBoost 200 HP ST||VW Polo 2.0 TSI 200 HP DSG GTI|
|Front width||135 cm||139 cm|
|Rear width||126 cm||132 cm|
|Front height||94-99 cm||90-96 cm|
|Rear height||86 cm||94 cm|
|Space for legs||66 cm||72 cm|
|Trunk||320 liters||250 liters|
FORD FIESTA ST VS VW POLO GTI – ENGINE COMPARISON
In the propellers, each manufacturer marks his line. Ford takes the concept of “downsizing” to the extreme, while Volkswagen, without renouncing technologies to maximize efficiency, almost proclaims the “upsizing” with greater displacement. Thus, the Fiesta goes from a 1.6 EcoBoost tetracilíndrico 182 hp -200 in some version to a 1.5 capable of working with direct and indirect injection being the first tricilíndrico with selective disconnection of a cylinder with low load . The Polo GTI uses the 2.0 TSI tetracilíndrico of the same Golf GTI, although with less power, instead of the previous 1.8 TSi. It also has direct and indirect injection while being able to combine the Miller-maximum efficiency-and Otto-benefits-according to your convenience.
The figures obtained by the 1.5 EcoBoost engine of the Fiesta are impressive , with measurements in acceleration almost traced to those of the pole, which in the power bank has only yielded 5 Hp and 2.4 mkg more. In addition, it is ranked as the most efficient in its category by consumption, even in sports driving; where it moves in 16-18 l / 100 km compared to 19-21 of its rival, that despite its greater displacement both on the road -with sailing function- and in the city it is among the least expendable. But in these models what matters is what they transmit, their touch, and here the 2.0 TSI is ahead. It feels more powerful, especially at low and medium level. Its maximum power gets 900 rpm before, although it reaches up to 6,000; 250 rpm more in the ST. Both feel very elastic. The Fiesta despite its tricylindrical condition does not transmit unpleasant vibrations, it brings good refinement and a more attractive sound; especially in the Sports and Circuit modes in which it opens a butterfly valve in its exhaust, besides activating a device through the audio equipment.
|CONSUMPTION||Ford Fiesta 1.5 EcoBoost 200 HP ST||VW Polo 2.0 TSI 200 HP DSG GTI|
|Consumption in the city||7.4 l / 100 km||8.0 l / 100 km|
|Road consumption||5.7 l / 100 km||5.9 l / 100 km|
|Average consumption||6.4 l / 100 km||6.8 l / 100 km|
The Fiesta ST has a 6-speed manual transmission, with a very good touch and speed, a pity of the lever placed so low, while the Polo GTI is only associated with the dual-clutch wet-piloted DSG with 6 speeds. A delight for its speed and comfort, much higher than the previous DSG 7 dry, but very sporty driving or not so satisfactory circuit as the manual.
Ford Fiesta ST vs VW Polo GTI: Experience
They coincide in the detailed work done in their frames . Both with McPherson architecture in the front and torsional axle in the rear. The ST tries to stand out with a Tenneco cushioning with variable oil pitch and rear springs of uthe neven spiral, to limit the misalignment of the wheels in strong supports; and the GTI with an adaptive one in its series equipment. Both are comfortable, while at the same time they perfectly control swinging and nodding in sporty driving.
The ST from the first bars feels more sporty, with a very fast direction – it only has 2 laps between stops – and superior agility. Something that will be positively valued by more experienced drivers, but can be confusing to others. At the limit, in a curve, its cushioning is surprising because of the ease with which it lifts the inner rear wheel, which produces the sensation of a very short course of the same, while it is placed on the line with ease but without finesse, with a rear that helps to close the turns. The GTI does not feel so agile, although it provides greater poise and precision. It’s easier for a wider audience. With a receptive rear train, although not so much. Of course, when the limit of adhesion is exceeded transversally and oversteer occurs its reactions are faster, while the Fiesta gives more time to its driver to decide how to act to recover the trajectory.
The ability to transmit power to the ground is of vital importance in very sporty driving or circuits . Here the ST wins by a land slide thanks to its optional Quaife mechanical differential that allows acceleration even before the corner of the curve and with more pressure on the pedal. Although also “pull” more on the direction when applying gas. In the GTI this is entrusted to the XDS electronic system, which emulates this work by very subtly braking the front wheel of the inside of the curve. It works very well, since you only notice its action by the flashing light of the ESP or when disconnecting it, where the traction losses are remarkable. In both are so well tuned their ESP that it is not worth disconnecting them, almost or in cthe ircuit. They also convince the tact and stopping the ower of their brakes, with more straight trajectories in the ST, that invite to rush with confidence braking.